Recent Blog Posts

Negative Comments About Your Doctor Could Get You Sued

Posted by George Tait | Jul 27, 2018 | 0 Comments

Doctor Kaouk testifies at a trial where one of his patients had defamed him online.

Everyone leaves reviews for everything. Whether it's the Wendy's down your block or the doctor you have seen since you were eleven. More people have started to review their physicians. But doctors and healthcare facilities are taking these people to court. Why? Because the reviews that people are leaving are hurting their practices and their reputations.

David Antoon

Retired Air Force Colonel David Antoon is one of many that expressed how they feel about their doctors online. Antoon had surgery about ten years ago that left him incontinent and impotent. He did not just leave one bad review for the doctor. Antoon sent him threatening emails and posted on Yelp all the surgeries his urologist had scheduled during his course of treatment. Dr. Jihad Kaouk, Atoon's urologist, went to the police and prosecutors when he felt it was getting out of hand. Atoon and Kaouk settled the case for $100 for the felony charges that Atoon could have faced up to a year in prison for.

Other Patients Being Sued:

  • Sherry Petta, a jazz singer, posted negative reviews about her doctors after a nose job and laser treatments, and other procedures she had. Doctors Albert Carlotti and Michelle Cabret-Carlotti were her physicians that performed these surgeries. Carlotti and Cabret-Carlotti subsequently sued her for defamation. The doctors won a $12 million jury verdict which forced Petta to file for bankruptcy and sell one of her homes.
  • Bahman Guyuron, a Cleveland physician, sued one of his former clients for posting negative reviews on Yelp and other sites. According to Guyuron's attorney his former patient stated many negative false accusations.

What Lines Were Crossed

Dr. Guyuron's attorney says, “…that although the First Amendment protects patients' rights to post their opinions, ‘our position is she (or they) did far beyond that (and) deliberately made false factual statements.'” Posting things not factually based are considered defamation or slander. The definition of defamation is “the communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of an individual, business, product, group government, religion, or nation.”  Of course, we are only talking about the individual and business side of defamation. Slander is similar because it means that you make false and damaging statements about someone. You need to be careful about what you say online. Yes, you can have grievances but you need to make sure that you are sharing them in the right format. Write a complaint. Talk to your doctor directly.

Our information source is cited in the article.  If you were involved in this incident or a similar incident and have questions about your rights and options, call us or another reputable law firm.

About the Author

George Tait

Since 2004 George Tait has dedicated his practice to helping injured people and their families get fair and full compensation from the insurance companies. Before becoming an attorney George Tait was a Registered Nurse for over 15 years. The last years of his nursing career were in the Universit...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

George Tait Law Is Here for You

We get compensation for people who are traumatically injured by the wrongdoing of others. We are trial lawyers and welcome the opportunity to try your case in court if necessary — the insurance companies know we will hold their feet to the fire.

Contact Our Firm Today

Call, text, or email and we will respond as soon as possible. We can tell you if you have a case worth pursuing.

We help people from all over Utah meeting virtually or in person to discuss your case for free.